ReviewFuture cardiology2025
Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves: navigating risks, anticoagulation, and valve function in a growing population.
Review in Future cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy in patients with prosthetic heart valves presents complex challenges requiring multidisciplinary care and individualized decision-making. While bioprosthetic valves are often preferred in women of childbearing age to avoid anticoagulation-related fetal risks, these valves are susceptible to structural degeneration potentially accelerated by the physiologic demands of pregnancy. Conversely, mechanical valves offer durability but necessitate lifelong anticoagulation, posing substantial risks of valve thrombosis, fetal hemorrhage, and warfarin embryopathy. The Ross operation, which can be considered for individuals with advanced aortic valve disease, is an appealing option yet is offered only in highly specialized centers. In this review, we present contemporary data on maternal and fetal outcomes, valve function, and anticoagulation strategies in pregnant patients with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves. We highlight geographical and knowledge gaps regarding type of valve utilization, optimal anticoagulation in pregnancy, durability of modern valve designs, and long-term reoperation risk. Future research priorities include uniform global approach with improved access to contemporary surgical and medical solutions in low- and middle-income countries, safety of direct oral anticoagulants, improved surveillance of valve function during pregnancy, and comparative studies of bioprosthetic valve models. By consolidating evolving evidence, we aim to support informed decision-making and multidisciplinary management for this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.