ArticleBiomarkers in medicine2025
Prognostic impact of Naples prognostic score on long-term mortality in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Biomarkers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of naples prognostic score and systemic immune-inflammation index with left ventricular recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Prognostic Associations of the Naples Score for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and a Prognostic Meta-Analysis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- The Association Between Naples Prognostic Score and Coronary Collateral Circulation in Patients with Chronic Coronary Total Occlusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) is a composite index of inflammation and nutritional status. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of NPS for long-term all-cause mortality in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
methodsIn this study, 396 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention between 1 August 2023, and 31 July 2024, were included. Patients were stratified into low (NPS: 0-1), intermediate (NPS: 2), and high (NPS: 3-4) risk groups. Median follow-up was 433 days. Univariate logistic regression identified predictors of longterm mortality. These were then entered into LASSOpenalized logistic regression for variable selection. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models assessed the independent predictors of long-term mortality, adjusting for SYNTAX score, hemoglobin, sodium, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
resultsHigh-risk NPS patients (
conclusionIn NSTEMI patients, NPS independently predicts long-term all-cause mortality beyond traditional risk markers and outperforms isolated inflammatory indices such as NLR and CRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.