Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817665›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Pathological Affective Dependence as a Risk Factor for Intimate Partner Violence: Initial Psychometric Validation of the Italian Version of the Pathological Affective Dependence Scale.

Pugliese Erica, Uvelli Allison, van Emmerik Arnold, Ferretti Fabio, Saliani Angelo Maria, Foschino-Barbaro Maria Grazia, Vigilante Teresa, Celitti Erika, Quintavalle Chiara, Mancini Francesco and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pugliese EricaClinical Psychology Group, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-6580
Uvelli AllisonDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3133
van Emmerik ArnoldClinical Psychology Group, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ferretti FabioDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-0965
Saliani Angelo MariaSchool of Cognitive Psychology (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy.
Foschino-Barbaro Maria GraziaSchool of Cognitive Psychology (AIPC), Bari, Italy.
Vigilante TeresaSchool of Cognitive Psychology (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy.
Celitti ErikaSchool of Cognitive Psychology (APC-SPC), Rome, Italy.
Quintavalle ChiaraSchool of Cognitive Psychology (AIPC), Bari, Italy.
Mancini FrancescoUniversity Guglielmo Marconi, Rome, Italy.
Arntz ArnoudClinical Psychology Group, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-2272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Pathological Affective Dependence Scale (PADS), which assesses both trait and state manifestations of Pathological Affective Dependence (PAD), a key risk factor for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV).

methodsTwo studies were conducted in the general population and IPV survivor samples. Study 1 used a sample of 360 participants for Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analysis (CFA and EFA). Study 2 included 362 participants for an additional CFA and reliability analysis to further assess the scale's factor structure and internal consistency, and for a correlational analysis to determine its convergent and discriminant validity.

resultsOur factor analytic findings revealed that the PADS' 17 items represent three factors: internal conflict, inability to separate and partner abuse. The scale's state and trait versions showed satisfactory reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that the PADS is a useful tool for assessing and enhancing our understanding of PAD as a psychological risk factor for IPV. As such, it can help prevent IPV and support individual IPV survivors by identifying and treating PAD, while also contributing to clinical and social research into IPV.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceMood DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultassessmentintimate partner violencepathological affective dependencesurvivorsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40817665
PMCPMC12357130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.