Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817636›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Deprescribing drugs with anticholinergic effects in older patients with increased risk of dementia in the multicomponent intervention study AgeWell.de.

Laura K Lepenies, Hanna M Seidling, Alexander Pabst, Melanie Luppa, Juliane Döhring, Martin Williamson, Thomas Frese, Jochen Gensichen, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Laura K LepeniesMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Internal Medicine IX - Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1186-355X
Hanna M SeidlingMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Internal Medicine IX - Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-634X
Alexander PabstInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Melanie LuppaInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane DöhringInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Martin WilliamsonInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Saale, Germany.
Jochen GensichenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Hanna KaduszkiewiczInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Service Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jochen René ThyrianGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Birgitt WieseMHH Information Technology - Science and Laboratory, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of General Practice, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
David CzockMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Internal Medicine IX - Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1217-5134

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704AFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704BFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704CFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704DFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704EFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01GL1704F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDrugs with anticholinergic effects are often considered as potentially inappropriate medications, especially for older patients, and deprescribing such drugs may improve cognitive function. The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of counselling on drug risks as part of a multimodal intervention to prevent cognitive decline.

methodsThe AgeWell.de study, a multi-centre, cluster-randomized controlled study, was conducted in 123 German general practices between June 2018 and January 2022. The study included a multicomponent intervention programme for patients at increased risk of dementia, delivered over a 2-year period. As part of the medication optimisation intervention, patient data and medication records were screened to identify medication risks and provide recommendations to general practitioners.

resultsIn total, 808 patients with complete data were included in the present analysis (intervention group = 374, control group = 434). At baseline, 132 (16.8%) patients had at least one anticholinergic prescription. After 2 years, approximately one-third of these patients no longer received drugs with anticholinergic effects. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups, with 67.6% and 72.1%, respectively, continuing to take drugs with anticholinergic effects (P = 0.57). Patients reported anticholinergic symptoms more frequently when taking any medication (5.0% vs 33.8%), and even more so when taking drugs with anticholinergic effects (56.1%). Deprescribing of all drugs with anticholinergic effects was non-significantly higher in patients who reported at least one anticholinergic symptom compared to patients without any anticholinergic symptoms (58.6% vs 54.1%).

conclusionThe medication optimisation intervention did not entail significant differences in anticholinergic deprescribing between the groups.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDeprescriptionsInappropriate PrescribingAgedAged, 80 and overCounselingFemaleGeneral PracticeGermanyHumansMaleRisk FactorsCholinergic Antagonistsanticholinergic drugsdementiadeprescribinglifestyle interventionrandomized controlled study

Identifiers

PMID40817636
PMCPMC12648363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.