ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Current Status and Influencing Factors of Decisional Conflict in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and initial validation of a scale assessing sources of decision hesitation in patients with lung cancer invited to participate in drug clinical trials.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- The "good cancer" paradox: Decisional conflict and unmet support needs in patients with thyroid cancer facing surgical decisions-A mixed-methods study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Decision-Making Readiness and Its Influencing Factors Among Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Observational
- Article
- Current Status and Influencing Factors of Decisional Conflict in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the current status of decisional conflict in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy and to analyze its influencing factors, with the aim of providing a basis for developing decision support strategies.
methodsFrom August to September 2024, a convenience sample of 500 patients receiving systemic therapy for lung cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, was surveyed. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale (CPITDM), Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PreDM), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).
resultThe mean DCS score was 47.28 ± 15.83, with subscale scores ranking from highest to lowest as decision support/effectiveness, decision uncertainty, and information/values. The mean CPITDM, PreDM, and DRS scores were 28.56 ± 3.91, 63.02 ± 11.65, and 9.46 ± 2.62, respectively. DCS was negatively correlated with CPITDM (r = -0.188, p < 0.001) and PreDM (r = -0.303, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with DRS (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified occupation, medical payment, treatment line, pathology, medication type, patient involvement, and preparedness as significant influencing factors (p < 0.05), explaining 59.9% of variance.
conclusionLung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy experience a relatively high level of decisional conflict, with many exhibiting delayed decision-making. Healthcare providers should identify high-risk patients early based on key influencing factors and explore practical clinical decision support interventions. Enhancing decision readiness and reducing decision regret may help to improve quality of life and reduce decisional conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.