ArticleMedical physics2025
Large-scale convolutional neural network for clinical target and multi-organ segmentation in gynecologic brachytherapy via multi-stage learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) is crucial for optimizing gynecologic brachytherapy treatment planning. However, performing this segmentation on Computed Tomography (CT) images remains particularly challenging due to anatomical variability, limited soft-tissue contrast, and the scarcity of annotated datasets. Compared to other radiotherapy domains, CT-based gynecologic brachytherapy segmentation is notably underrepresented in benchmarking studies. PURPOSE: This study aims to improve the segmentation of HRCTV and OARs in gynecologic brachytherapy by introducing GynBTNet, a multi-stage learning framework. Through large-scale self-supervised pretraining and progressive finetuning, the model is designed to enhance anatomical representation learning and adapt effectively to domain-specific gynecologic structures, addressing the challenges of limited training data and complex anatomical variability.
methodsGynBTNet employs a three-stage training strategy: (1) self-supervised pretraining on large-scale CT datasets using sparse submanifold convolution to capture robust anatomical representations, (2) supervised finetuning on a multi-organ segmentation dataset to refine feature extraction, and (3) task-specific finetuning on the gynecologic brachytherapy dataset to optimize segmentation performance for clinical applications. In the third stage, 116 cases were used for training, while 29 cases were reserved for independent testing. The model was evaluated against state-of-the-art methods using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95%), and Average Surface Distance (ASD). Overall statistical significance across models was assessed using the Friedman test. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using two-tailed paired permutation tests, with multi-comparison correction via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate. Cohen's effect sizes were calculated to quantify the performance differences.
resultsGynBTNet demonstrated consistent superiority over nnU-Net across all structures and achieved overall favorable performance compared to Swin-UNETR. The most substantial improvement was observed in HRCTV segmentation, where GynBTNet achieved a DSC of 0.837 ± 0.068, significantly higher than nnU-Net (p < 0.05) with a large effect size of +1.25, and superior to Swin-UNETR with a moderate-to-large effect size of +0.57. Boundary precision for HRCTV also improved significantly, with effect sizes in HD95% (-0.81 vs. nnU-Net, -0.52 vs. Swin-UNETR) and ASD (-1.20 vs. nnU-Net, -0.61 vs. Swin-UNETR). For bladder segmentation, GynBTNet reached a DSC of 0.940 ± 0.052, significantly outperforming nnU-Net (p < 0.05) with a large effect size of +1.28 and showing a small advantage over Swin-UNETR (effect size +0.26). In rectum segmentation, GynBTNet achieved a DSC of 0.842 ± 0.070, significantly exceeding nnU-Net (p < 0.05) with a large effect size of +1.17, and surpassing Swin-UNETR with an effect size of +0.54. For the uterus, GynBTNet significantly improved boundary accuracy compared to both nnU-Net and Swin-UNETR (p < 0.05), with effect sizes in ASD of -0.99 and -0.64. Segmentation of the sigmoid colon remained challenging, as GynBTNet provided only marginal DSC gains over nnU-Net with negligible effect sizes.
conclusionsThe proposed multi-stage learning strategy effectively enhances segmentation accuracy for gynecologic brachytherapy, leveraging large-scale self-supervised pretraining and progressive finetuning. By improving HRCTV and OARs delineation, GynBTNet has the potential to enhance treatment planning precision, minimize radiation exposure to critical structures, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.