Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817414›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intensified process based on reactive distillation for Triacetin production via glycerol esterification with acetic acid.

Nattawat Petchsoongsakul, Kanokwan Ngaosuwan, Worapon Kiatkittipong, Doonyapong Wongsawaeng, Weerinda Mens, Santi Chuetor, Pongtorn Charoensuppanimit, Armando T Quitain, Tetsuya Kida, Suttichai Assabumrungrat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Defect-Engineered MOF-808-SOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nattawat PetchsoongsakulCenter of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction Engineering and Bio-Circular- Green economy Technology and Engineering Center (BCGeTEC), Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Kanokwan NgaosuwanChemical Engineering Division, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Bangkok, 10120, Thailand.
Worapon KiatkittipongDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand.
Doonyapong WongsawaengDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Weerinda MensDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Pathumtani, 12110, Thailand.
Santi ChuetorDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, 10800, Thailand.
Pongtorn CharoensuppanimitCenter of Excellence in Particle and Materials Processing Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Armando T QuitainCenter for International Education, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Tetsuya KidaFaculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Institute of Industrial Nanomaterials (IINa), and International Research Organization for Advanced Science and Technology (IROAST), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Suttichai AssabumrungratCenter of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction Engineering and Bio-Circular- Green economy Technology and Engineering Center (BCGeTEC), Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Suttichai.A@chula.ac.th.

Funding

Chulalongkorn University The Second Century Fund (C2F)National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) NRCT-JSPS GrantOffice of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand Reinventing University Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the valorization of glycerol through triacetin (TA) production via glycerol esterification with acetic acid using reactive distillation (RD). The conventional TA production typically involved multiple unit operations, leading to process complexity and high costs. A simplified TA production process based on the appropriate design for RD was developed. The simulation results, validated by a robust kinetic model, demonstrated the high accuracy to predict glycerol conversion and TA purity. The optimized RD required only 32 theoretical stages using an acetic acid to glycerol feed molar ratio of 3:1, glycerol feed at the 2nd stage, acetic acid feed at the 31st stage, a reflux ratio of 7, and a bottom to feed ratio of 0.25 under column pressure of 0.7 bar without an entrainer. This configuration achieved the remarkable performance, with a 99.20% glycerol conversion, 99.41% TA selectivity, and 99.00% TA purity. The number of unit operations of RD process was reduced to 50%, leading to acquiring only 79.16% of the capital cost as compared to the conventional method. This finding highlights the economic advantage of the RD process, offering a sustainable, cost-effective, and scalable alternative for large-scale TA production.

Indexed as

Glycerol esterificationProcess intensificationReactive distillation (RD)Triacetin (TA)

Identifiers

PMID40817414
PMCPMC12356845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.