ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of spectral characteristics of urine in bladder cancer diagnostics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finding a non-invasive diagnostic method with sufficient diagnostic power is crucial for early detection of malignant tumor diseases. The main goal of the presented work is to observe changes in the spectral characteristics of urine between patients diagnosed with bladder cancer and control subjects. Data were obtained through fluorescence spectroscopy and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The data obtained from multiple fluorescence spectra measurements were graphically represented as excitation-emission matrices (EEMs). In both EEMs and chromatograms, statistically significant peaks and areas were identified, which were evaluated using various statistical methods and machine learning techniques (logistic regression, OPLS-DA, convolutional neural networks). The analysis of urine EEMs did not yield satisfactory results; the highest accuracy was achieved using convolutional neural networks, with a maximum accuracy of 72.1% for the training model. Regarding chromatograms, the best results were obtained by applying convolutional neural networks to chromatogram data, achieving an accuracy of 95.3% for the training model. Established methods of data standardization did not improve performance of discrimination models. Our findings highlight the importance of a multi-parametric approach that captures interactions among spectral features, reflecting not only the complexity of cancer but also inter-individual variability among patients. The integration of urinary spectral data with advanced machine learning methods shows potential for improving patient stratification in BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.