Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817392›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Melanopsin-mediated image statistics from natural and human-made environments.

Pablo A Barrionuevo, Francisco Diaz-Barrancas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo A BarrionuevoAG Sensomotorisches Lernen, Fachbereich Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. pablo.barrionuevo@uni-marburg.de.
Francisco Diaz-BarrancasDepartamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos y Telemáticos, Universidad de Extremadura, Mérida, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) play a critical role in regulating physiological and behavioral responses to light. However, little is known about how melanopsin and ipRGC signals are shaped by the statistical properties of real-world environments. Here, we analyzed the statistics of melanopsin, ipRGC codification of extrinsic and intrinsic photoresponses, and luminance using hyperspectral images of natural and human-made scenes under daylight illumination. The statistics were obtained by modeling human retinal receptive fields from current knowledge about ipRGC anatomy and physiology. Our findings reveal that human-made environments exhibit significantly higher melanopsin, luminance, and ipRGC excitations compared to natural environments. This difference is linked to higher reflectance values in human-made environments. In natural scenes, luminance contrasts were higher than melanopsin and ipRGC contrasts across most of the range. Melanopsin contrast was largely independent of excitation and was significantly reduced for larger receptive fields. Differences between ipRGC codification models suggest an interaction between input weighting and environmental structure. These results indicate that modifications of natural regularities by human-made environments could affect ipRGC-driven physiology in everyday life and may deviate from the evolutionary constraints that shaped ipRGC function.

Indexed as

EnvironmentRetinal Ganglion CellsRod OpsinsHumansLightMelanopsinPhotic StimulationMelanopsinRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID40817392
PMCPMC12356983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.