ArticleScientific reports2025
The critical dimension of memory engrams and an optimal number of senses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we analyse the fundamental question: how many senses are optimal for memory and learning. To answer this question, we introduce and analyse a novel kinetic model of memory engrams. The model, built on basic general principles and phenomenology, captures the engrams' emergence and evolution driven by their interaction with external environment, learning, and forgetting. We derive the corresponding kinetic equation governing the dynamics and evolution of engrams over time. We then solve this equation analytically and numerically through Monte Carlo simulations. We observe the formation of a steady state with a steady number of different engrams covering a fraction of the conceptual space. We analyze the impact of the dimension of the conceptual space on the steady state and discover the existence of a critical dimension, at which the number of different engrams is maximal; we provide a theoretical explanation of this observation. If each feature is associated with a different sense, the critical dimension corresponds to an optimal number of senses for a system aiming at keeping the maximal number of different concepts in its memory. We also reveal an apparent tension between the system's receptivity to new stimuli and concept sharpness-the higher the receptivity, the less sharp the learned concept becomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.