Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817360›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2025

Analgesia, Sedation, and Neuromuscular Blockade in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of the "Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial" (ADAPT).

Jennifer Clancy Laws, Jaskaran Rakkar, Sandra D W Buttram, Michael Seth Wolf

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04077411 (Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04077411 completednot on this map

Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,000ConditionsSevere Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsObservational
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer Clancy Laws *Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jaskaran Rakkar *Division of Critical Care, Department of Child Health, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sandra D W ButtramDivision of Critical Care, Department of Child Health, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Michael Seth WolfDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. michael.wolf@vumc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1681-0353

Funding

Multiple Medical Therapies for Pediatric TBI; Comparative Effectiveness ApproachU01NS081041 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BELL, MICHAEL J, WISNIEWSKI, STEPHEN R · 2013 to 2017
$15.9M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS081041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedative, analgesia, and neuromuscular blocking (NMB) medications may be necessary in the acute management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), yet limited data exist to guide their use. We aimed to describe the use of continuous infusions of these medications in children with sTBI, to determine temporal trends during the first week of management, and to evaluate associations with in-hospital mortality.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Trial (NCT04077411, 2014-2017), a prospective multicenter observational study of patients < 18 years old with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) who underwent intracranial pressure monitoring. Continuous analgesic, sedative, and NMB medication infusions administered in the first 7 days after sTBI were analyzed.

resultsData from 929 patients were analyzed with a median Glasgow Coma Scale of 6 (interquartile range 3-7), 14% hospital mortality. In the 7 days after intracranial pressure monitor placement, 866 (93%) patients received an opioid infusion, with 659 (71%) patients having received fentanyl. A total of 679 (73%) patients received benzodiazepine: 671 (72%) patients received midazolam. A total of 362 (39%) patients received NMB, with the most common being vecuronium, administered to 141 (15%) patients. Propofol was administered to 264 (28%) patients, alpha-2 agonist to 263 (28%) patients, and ketamine to 4 (0.43%) patients. The median number of infusions per patient was 2 (interquartile range 1-2), with the highest number on intensive care unit day 2. Morphine and dexmedetomidine infusions were used more often in survivors than nonsurvivors (33 vs. 16%, and 30 vs. 9%, respectively, p < 0.001).

conclusionsFentanyl and midazolam were the most common analgesic and sedative continuous infusions during acute pediatric sTBI management. Propofol and dexmedetomidine were used less frequently. Opioid (specifically morphine) and dexmedetomidine infusions were associated with survival. Larger studies are needed to determine the safest and most effective analgesia, sedation, and NMB medication strategy for children with sTBI.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidBrain Injuries, TraumaticHypnotics and SedativesNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDexmedetomidineFemaleFentanylGlasgow Coma ScaleHospital MortalityHumansAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDexmedetomidineFentanylHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsAnalgesiaBrain injuries (traumatic)Hypnotics and sedativesIntracranial pressureNeuromuscular blockade

Identifiers

PMID40817360
PMCPMC12459016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.