Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817358›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

The influence of perceptual load on behavioral interference of simultaneous positive and negative emotional distractors.

Yukta Thyagaraj, Srikanth Padmala

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yukta ThyagarajCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, KA, India, 560012.
Srikanth PadmalaCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, KA, India, 560012. spadmala@iisc.ac.in.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India CRG/2022/002436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prioritized processing of emotional stimuli could be detrimental in contexts where the affective information is not goal relevant. To examine whether the behavioral interference of task-irrelevant emotional stimuli depends on the primary task demands, several past studies varied the perceptual load, thus manipulating the resources available for processing emotional distractors. In particular, some previous work reported valence asymmetry in the effects of high (vs. low) perceptual load where negative distraction was reduced but positive distraction was resistant to the perceptual load manipulation. However, previous studies have investigated the impact of perceptual load on attentional capture by positive and negative distractors in isolation. Given real-life scenarios where positive and negative emotional stimuli co-occur, it becomes essential to understand how perceptual load modulates the behavioral interference of simultaneous positive and negative distractors. To address this critical gap, we conducted three behavioral experiments using a letter-search task involving low and high perceptual load, during which simultaneous positive-negative, positive-positive, negative-negative, and neutral-neutral emotional scene distractors were presented. We tested several competing hypotheses regarding how high (relative to low) perceptual load could impact the attentional capture of simultaneous emotional distractors. Across three experiments, in the reaction time data, we consistently found evidence that during high (relative to low) perceptual load, the interference effects of simultaneous emotional distractors were diminished regardless of their valence combination. Our findings do not support the proposed special status of positive distractors under high perceptual load and instead indicate that the effects of perceptual load on simultaneous emotional distractors are valence insensitive.

Indexed as

AttentionEmotionsPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentionBehavioral interferenceEmotionPerceptual loadValence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.