ArticleGeroScience2025
BrainAGE in superagers: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in older adults aged 80+ with youthful episodic memory.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities of gap score methods for studying psychopathology resilience and vulnerability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Episodic memory, the ability to recall past events, is particularly vulnerable to ageing. A decline in episodic memory performance is generally considered part of ageing. However, the episodic memory performance of superagers -defined as individuals aged 80+ years old with episodic memory of people 30 years younger- is superior to that typical of their chronological age. The aim of this study was to determine whether the discrepancy between the superager's episodic memory and chronological age is also evident in their brain age. A BrainAGE (Brain Age Gap Estimation) approach, a multidimensional computational neuroanatomical method that uses structural neuroimaging data to estimate biological brain age, was applied. The study population comprised 64 superagers (mean age = 81.9 ± 1.9) and 55 age-matched typical older adults (82.4 ± 1.9). Cross-sectional analyses revealed a negative BrainAGE score for superagers (mean = -0.95 ± 2.36) indicating a deceleration of the ageing process. By contrast, typical older adults showed an average score close to zero (0.05 ± 3.03) consistent with their chronological age. The BrainAGE score of superagers was found to be lower relative to typical older adults, and the progression over a 5-year follow-up period was slower in superagers, in keeping with their youthful memory ability. Therefore, superagers have a younger brain than those of typical older adults, suggesting that their ageing mechanisms may involve resistance to age-related brain structural changes. However, despite a 30-year gap in episodic memory, their BrainAGE score differed by only one year, indicating that factors beyond brain structure contribute to the superager phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.