ArticleScientific reports2025
High sensitivity in spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection from emergency head CT scans using ensemble-learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validity of deep learning solution for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection on head CT scans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Multi-Input Neural Network for Microwave Hemorrhagic Stroke Identification Using Multimodal Data.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Research progress on abdominal epilepsy in children.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages have a high disease burden. Due to increasing medical imaging, new technological solutions for assisting in image interpretation are warranted. We developed a deep learning (DL) solution for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection from head CT scans. The DL solution included four base convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which were trained using 300 head CT scans. A metamodel was trained on top of the four base CNNs, and simple post processing steps were applied to improve the solution's accuracy. The solution performance was evaluated using a retrospective dataset of consecutive emergency head CTs imaged in ten different emergency rooms. 7797 head CT scans were included in the validation dataset and 118 CT scans presented with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The trained metamodel together with a simple rule-based post-processing step showed 89.8% sensitivity and 89.5% specificity for hemorrhage detection at the case-level. The solution detected all 78 spontaneous hemorrhage cases imaged presumably or confirmedly within 12 h from the symptom onset and identified five hemorrhages missed in the initial on-call reports. Although the success of DL algorithms depends on multiple factors, including training data versatility and quality of annotations, using the proposed ensemble-learning approach and rule-based post-processing may help clinicians to develop highly accurate DL solutions for clinical imaging diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.