ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Extracting Pretreatment Pancreatic Cancer According to Computed Tomography Radiology Reports.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Zero-Shot to Bedside: A Practical Playbook for Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models to Clinical Symptom Extraction.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the performance of a fine-tuned large language model (LLM) in extracting pretreatment pancreatic cancer according to computed tomography (CT) radiology reports and to compare it with that of readers. This retrospective study included 2690, 886, and 378 CT reports for the training, validation, and test datasets, respectively. Clinical indication, image finding, and imaging diagnosis sections of the radiology report (used as input data) were reviewed and categorized into groups 0 (no pancreatic cancer), 1 (after treatment for pancreatic cancer), and 2 (pretreatment pancreatic cancer present) (used as reference data). A pre-trained Bidirectional Encoder Representation from the Transformers Japanese model was fine-tuned with the training and validation dataset. Group 1 data were undersampled and group 2 data were oversampled in the training dataset due to group imbalance. The best-performing model from the validation set was subsequently assessed using the test dataset for testing purposes. Additionally, three readers (readers 1, 2, and 3) were involved in classifying reports within the test dataset. The fine-tuned LLM and readers 1, 2, and 3 demonstrated an overall accuracy of 0.942, 0.984, 0.979, and 0.947; sensitivity for differentiating groups 0/1/2 of 0.944/0.960/0.921, 0.976/1.000/0.976, 0.984/0.984/0.968, and 1.000/1.000/0.841; and total time required for classification of 49 s, 2689 s, 3496 s, and 4887 s, respectively. Fine-tuned LLM effectively extracted patients with pretreatment pancreatic cancer according to CT radiology reports, and its performance was comparable to that of readers in a shorter time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.