ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychometric evaluation of the Slovak adaptation of the psychological immune competence inventory (PICI).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Slovak adaptation of the Psychological Immune Competence Inventory (PICI). The instrument is designed to measure psychological immunity, representing a comprehensive system of personal competencies that promote mental health and enable efficient stress management. Additionally, it is designed to provide a personalized profile of psychological resilience. The research sample consisted of 585 individuals from the general population, of whom 261 completed a 6- to 8-month follow-up. The factor structure and invariance of the instrument were assessed by structural equation modeling (SEM) using diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS). The SEM results indicated an adequate model fit after incorporating theoretically reasonable modification indices, thereby supporting the original factor structure. The scales demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from moderate to very high levels. Invariance measurement confirmed the psychometric equivalence of the instrument across gender, age, and education groups. Test-retest reliability was acceptable to high across all scales, as indicated by intra-class and stability correlations. Overall, the Slovak version of the PICI shows appropriate psychometric properties and appears to be invariant across demographic groups, supporting its reliability and validity for use in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.