ArticleScientific reports2025
Rapid SNP genotyping detection method based on PCR-lateral flow dipstick detection technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study established a polymerase chain reaction-lateral flow dipstick (PCR-LFD) method for the visual detection of SNP genotypes. Targeting the MC4R gene SNP g.732 C > G, highly specific primers were designed for the mutation site, incorporating a Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) modification at the 3' terminal nucleotide of the SNP, a BIOTIN modification at the 5' end of the upstream primer, and a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) modification at the 5' end of the downstream primer. The detection primers were used for PCR amplification with the sample, and the reaction system was optimized. The amplification products were subsequently detected using LFD. The results demonstrated that the optimized reaction system and modified primers effectively distinguished among CC, CG, and GG genotypes at the g.732 C > G. Blood samples from 24 Hu sheep were analyzed using the PCR-LFD assay specific to this SNP. The genotyping results from PCR-LFD were completely consistent with those obtained from the mutation analysis of the same blood samples. The PCR-LFD method established in this study did not require genomic DNA extraction; whole blood could be directly used as a template for PCR amplification combined with LFD, enabling on-site visual detection. This positions PCR-LFD as a rapid, simple, and visually interpretable tool for on-site SNP genotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.