SynthesisArchives of virology2025
Evaluation of recent pre-booster studies on hepatitis B vaccine effectiveness across WHO regions with HBV prevalence above 1% in the general population up to 60 years of age: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatitis B vaccination has substantially reduced the global burden of HBV infection. However, the long-term vaccine effectiveness (VE) and the need for booster doses are still uncertain, especially in some age groups living in meso- and hyperendemic regions. WHO has therefore emphasized the need for further studies to identify subgroups requiring booster doses to ensure sufficient levels of protection against HBV infection. Accordingly, in the present review, we evaluate VE and the need for booster doses among healthy urban populations aged up to 60 years in the WHO regions where the HBV prevalence exceeds 1%. This systematic review included studies reporting VE stratified by age that expressed estimates as odds ratios, risk ratios, or absolute risk. Of the 2,421 studies identified in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, 11 met the inclusion criteria. There were significant age-related trends in VE. Among the 20- to 59-year-olds, especially the 20–39 age group, the effectiveness was the lowest in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, namely Tunisia and Iran. In China, the highest breakthrough infection rates were reported in the 18–29 age group, highlighting the significance of considering booster doses for enhanced protection in this population. The highest-risk ages in Vietnam were found to be 33.7, 53.8, and 24.9 years. In Africa, although the effectiveness was high among those who had received complete vaccine dosages, it declined among those aged 30–59 years with increasing age. Increased abnormal ALT rates with advancing age, a predictor of chronic HBV infection, also highlighted the need for additional booster immunizations in Taiwan and Gambia. The results indicate waning vaccine effectiveness, particularly in individuals 20–59 years old in meso- to hyper-endemic regions. These findings strongly support revisiting the vaccination schedules with consideration for targeted booster doses to maintain immunity for a longer period. This review also highlights the fact that the assessment of vaccine effectiveness and its side effects in various age and geographical groups is incomplete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40817198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.