ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations of onset primacy in visual change detection.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generally, newly appearing objects attract observers' attention more effectively than other types of change in an environment. While there is consensus about the existence of this phenomenon, it has been debated whether the new objects attain their primacy in an endogenous or an exogenous fashion. To contribute to this debate, the current study measured participants' behavioural performance in detecting object appearance (onset) and disappearance (offset) while recording their electroencephalography. Some participants were trained to give priority to detecting offsets, and their data were compared against those of neutral (i.e., untrained) participants. This comparison revealed that the difference in behavioural response times between onset and offset detection was reduced after training, reflecting the degree to which onsets had attentional advantage over offsets in each group of participants. At the same time, amplitudes of the P100 event-related potential component were more differentiated between onset and offset detection in the trained participants than in the neutral participants. Critically, the modulations of the response times and the P100 amplitudes were not attributed to stimulus-driven effects because all participants were exposed to the same set of stimuli when the post-training results were obtained. Thus, these findings offer evidence that the relative efficacy of object onset in visual change detection is not purely a bottom-up phenomenon but is instead modulated by top-down processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.