ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Clinical use of vedolizumab subcutaneous formulation in inflammatory bowel diseases: a review of real-world evidence.
Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVedolizumab is an advanced therapy indicated for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). After induction with vedolizumab intravenous (IV), maintenance is with vedolizumab 300 mg IV every 8 weeks, or patients can transition to vedolizumab 108 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks.
methodsThis was a literature review of the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2024 to identify publications describing clinical practice experiences on the transition from vedolizumab IV to SC.
resultsIn total, 36 eligible publications were identified, comprising 4105 UC and CD patients treated with vedolizumab: 2718 with vedolizumab SC. Across studies, there was no loss of effectiveness after transition from vedolizumab IV to SC based on disease activity scores or biomarkers (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin). Higher vedolizumab trough levels were observed consistently with vedolizumab SC versus IV. Treatment persistence with vedolizumab SC ranged from 89.0% to 95.5% after 3 - 6 months and approximately 81% to 89% at 12 months. A willingness to transition to the SC formulation was reported by 47% to 59% of patients, due to time savings and fewer hospital visits. Patients who transitioned to vedolizumab SC showed a high level of satisfaction (75% - 95%) with the transition. The most frequently reported adverse events with vedolizumab SC were injection site reactions, with frequencies of 2.9% to 18.5%.
conclusionsClinical practice experience in inflammatory bowel disease patients who transitioned from vedolizumab IV to SC showed no change in effectiveness or safety outcomes, and a high level of patient satisfaction overall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.