ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
The lung immune prognostic index stratifies the occurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The lung immune prognostic index as a predictive biomarker in urological malignancies undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The price of immune awakening: bridging knowledge gaps in checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is associated with survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy, but the association with the occurrence of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively included 1824 patients with advanced NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) at two institutions. Cox regression analysis and cumulative incidence curve were used to evaluate the predictive value of LIPI. Additionally, we performed competing risk analysis using Fine-Gray regression and cumulative incidence curves.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 15 months, 99 patients developed CIP. Compared with the good LIPI group, the intermediate LIPI group (HR 1.87, P = 0.007) and poor LIPI group (HR 4.39, P < 0.001) had a higher risk of CIP. Furthermore, we found LIPI was an independent predictor for intermediate-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 2.11, P = 0.056; poor LIPI: HR 4.51, P = 0.002) and high-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 6.94, P = 0.014; poor LIPI: HR 44.01, P < 0.001), but not for low-grade CIP (intermediate LIPI: HR 1.31, P = 0.392; poor LIPI: HR 0.72, P = 0.656). Similar results were obtained after competing risk analysis.
conclusionsLIPI grade shows potential in predicting the risk of CIP during immunotherapy and could be valuable in clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.