ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Temporal image compression in cardiac computed tomography: impact of temporal super resolution and noise reduction for assessing left ventricular function.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is valuable for assessing left ventricular (LV) function. However, it leads to increased data storage demands and energy consumption. Temporal super resolution (TSR) has the potential to reduce temporal data size while preserving accuracy. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using TSR for temporal image compression in LV functional analysis. The study included 20 patients who underwent retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated cardiac CT, from which 20 cardiac phases per patient were acquired. TSR was applied to temporally compressed image data sets, with and without noise reduction (NR), using two NR levels: weak (30%) and strong (70%). Five data sets-including the original uncompressed data and four compressed versions-were analyzed for LV function using fully automated software. Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess measurement agreement and reliability. The correlations between the uncompressed and compressed data sets for LV end-systolic volumes (ESVs), end-diastolic volumes (EDVs), and ejection fractions (EFs) were strong (all r = 1.00, 95% CI = 1.00-1.00, all Ps < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed reduced bias in LV measurements when TSR was applied without NR, while bias increased when NR was applied at both levels. The limits of agreement (LOA) were narrower for EDV but remained wider for ESV and EF. TSR without NR reduced bias but failed to narrow LOA, with EF improving or unchanged in 35% of cases. While this level of consistency is limited, the findings suggest that TSR may preserve functional accuracy under certain conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40817156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.