Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817108›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2025

Exploring brushing and questionnaire data from a feasibility randomised control trial of a school-based smart, connected toothbrushing program.

Michaela Goodwin, George Kitsaras, Momina Muzammil, Nicola Boothman, Juliana Gomez, Beulah Amulyavathi Gangaraju, Tanya Walsh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Parental oral health knowledge and sociodemographic influences in children aged 2-12 years: a cross-sectional study in Valencia, Spain.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michaela GoodwinColgate-Palmolive Company, Dental Health Unit, Williams House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK. michaela.goodwin@manchester.ac.uk.
George KitsarasDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Momina MuzammilDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nicola BoothmanDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Juliana GomezColgate-Palmolive Company, Dental Health Unit, Williams House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK.
Beulah Amulyavathi GangarajuDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tanya WalshDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren's oral health continues to be a key issue, with dental caries remaining one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases. One of the main ways to prevent dental caries is to carry out adequate toothbrushing with fluoridated toothpaste. Connected or 'smart' toothbrushes can provide real-time feedback on brushing behaviour to individuals or be used to provide feedback to groups for example within a school setting. This study aimed to identify the engagement level of school children with a smart, connected toothbrush, explore brushing frequency, timing, coverage, and duration during the research period, and compare data to observed changes over time.

methodsData on brushing behaviour were obtained from a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial exploring smart, connected toothbrush use in a school-based brushing programme. Participants, aged 8-11 with access to a smart device, were recruited from six primary schools located in deprived areas of Manchester, England. Randomisation at the school level allocated participants to receive either a smart, connected toothbrush and text message intervention (intervention group) or the smart, connected toothbrush only (control group).

resultsOf the 409 participants provided with a smart, connected toothbrush, 289 (71%) connected and used the device during the study. Of those who engaged with the connected devices, participants brushed at least twice a day on 48.2% of the days they brushed. On completed questionnaires, 78.8% of parents indicated their children brushed their teeth twice a day. Brushing frequency appeared to decrease over the weekends, particularly on weekend mornings.

conclusionsThe results from this feasibility trial suggest that toothbrushing habits remain a fundamental area of importance, with a substantial proportion of children not brushing according to recommendations. Not all children connected or consistently used their devices during the study. Twice-daily brushing was infrequently recorded. Consideration must be given to the potential omission of brushing sessions, as the data may miss out sessions until the user syncs the brush with the app. Further research is needed to identify how frequency of brushing, particularly at the weekends, could be improved. REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at ISRCTN, registration number ISRCTN77803149 on 28/12/2023.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesToothbrushingChildDental CariesEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesText MessagingConnected devicesOral healthSchoolTechnologyText messagesToothbrushing

Identifiers

PMID40817108
PMCPMC12357393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.