ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Gelatinous pleural effusion in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGelatinous pleural effusions, a rare subtype of exudative effusions with elevated viscosity due to high hyaluronic acid levels, are often associated with malignancies, particularly malignant pleural mesothelioma and some metastatic cancers. Such effusions present unique challenges in both diagnosis and management due to their thickness, which complicates drainage using standard techniques. This case highlights the clinical significance of recognizing unusual pleural fluid characteristics and employing advanced drainage interventions, particularly in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Given their rarity, gelatinous pleural effusions are not widely reported, emphasizing the need for increased awareness of their diagnostic and therapeutic implications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old African American female patient with lung adenocarcinoma was admitted with a re-accumulating pleural effusion that required further intervention. A Pleurex catheter was placed for continuous drainage, revealing a gelatinous, coagulated effusion that resisted standard drainage techniques. An initial 250 mL of fluid was removed, followed by an additional 1.2 L after intrapleural hyaluronidase was administered to break down the viscosity. Cytology confirmed the presence of malignant cells, positive for CK-7 and TTF-1, and negative for calretinin, Ber-EP4, and CK-20, supporting the diagnosis of primary lung adenocarcinoma. Despite successful fluid removal, imaging indicated a trapped lung, preventing full re-expansion of the pleural space. The patient's care was transitioned to home management with intermittent Pleurex catheter drainage and palliative care support, with plans for outpatient follow-up and ongoing monitoring.
conclusionsThis case underscores the complexities associated with managing gelatinous pleural effusions, particularly in the context of malignancy. The patient's palliative management, including the use of an indwelling pleural catheter, highlights the focus on symptom relief in advanced disease stages. Recognizing gelatinous pleural effusions as a potential diagnostic indicator, particularly in patients with malignancies, can facilitate timely interventions that may improve quality of life. Continued research and clinical awareness are essential to optimize diagnostic approaches and treatment options for these rare, challenging effusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.