Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817055›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

The Gendered Well-being Assessment: addressing trauma, complex needs & social determinants of health.

Denise Ruprai, Simon Pemberton, Richard Summers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denise RupraiThe University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. d.ruprai@bham.ac.uk.
Simon PembertonThe University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard SummersThe University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's Centres in the UK provide crucial support to women with complex needs, who are often excluded from statutory services, frequently acting as a service of 'last resort'. A major challenge when working with this population is the lack of a holistic, validated, and gender-responsive assessment tool to measure needs comprehensively and systematically. This paper introduces the Gendered Well-being Assessment (GWA), a trauma-informed quality-of-life assessment designed for women with complex needs outside the criminal justice system. The GWA aims to support early intervention, enhance multi-agency collaboration, whilst offering a structured framework for case management. A comprehensive scoring algorithm combines contemporary research on accumulative complex trauma, complex needs, and toxic stress physiology with an overall aim to highlight unmet needs to avoid preventable harm and improve overall quality of life. The assessment takes account of the interconnectedness of needs, and across 5 key domains, and 12 sections create a comprehensive overview of the breadth and depth of needs. Unlike fragmented assessments, the GWA integrates multiple validated tools into a single framework, ensuring credibility within multi-agency partnerships. By recognising protective factors like self-efficacy and social support, the GWA moves beyond harm mitigation to promote resilience and flourishing. Its structured, algorithm-based approach informs personalised support plans, transforming service provision and policy. This innovative tool ensures that women's needs are addressed comprehensively and equitably within a broader social context.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentQuality of LifeSocial Determinants of HealthFemaleHumansSocial SupportUnited KingdomAccumulative traumaComplex needsComplex traumaGender-responsive assessmentMulti-agency collaborationQuality-of-life assessmentTrauma-informed careWomen’s services

Identifiers

PMID40817055
PMCPMC12355881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.