ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Bailout Percutaneous Intervention for Acute Aortic Occlusion.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute aortic occlusion is a rare but life-threatening condition. Prompt diagnosis and urgent revascularization are keys to patient survival. CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old man was admitted with acute embolic aortic occlusion. Appropriate means for urgent revascularization were not readily available. Primary percutaneous angioplasty of the aorta with catheter-directed thrombolysis and balloon angioplasty using coronary artery-dedicated devices were successfully performed. DISCUSSION: Acute aortic occlusion is commonly caused by in situ thrombosis or saddle emboli. Surgical management such as aortobifemoral bypass and aortic endarterectomy have been considered the standard approach treatments. However, endovascular and percutaneous revascularization techniques have become more commonly used over time. In our salvage procedure, we used coronary artery-specific devices with catheter-directed thrombolysis. To the best of our knowledge, this "off-label" technique has not been previously reported. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Coronary artery-dedicated devices might be safely used as a bailout percutaneous revascularization intervention in acute aortic occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.