ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2025
Screening and targeted prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile infection.
Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePatients receiving immunosuppression for oncology treatment and solid organ transplantation are at high risk for developing hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI). We studied the impact of a prophylactic enteral vancomycin intervention on the reduction of HO-CDI during high-risk inpatient admissions among immunocompromised patients.
methodsThe screening and targeted prophylaxis (STOP) intervention was implemented over a 2-year period. Patients admitted for solid organ transplant, autologous stem cell transplant, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, or treatment for leukaemia were screened for colonization with C. difficile. Colonized patients were placed in contact isolation and were advised to start anti-C.difficile antibiotic prophylaxis. To assess the effect of this intervention on both C.difficile testing and incident HO-CDI, comparison was made to historical controls in the 2 years before implementation of the STOP intervention, both unweighted and weighted by treatment category and separately by treatment category and severity of illness.
resultsFrom November 2021 to December 2023, 696 patients were screened for C difficile, among whom 11.1% (77/696) were found to be colonized and received the prophylactic intervention. Compared with treatment-weighted controls, the odds of HO-CDI were significantly lower in the intervention group (6/696 [0.88%] vs. 81/1450 [5.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% Credible Interval [CrI], 0.06-0.30). Significant reductions in 90-day CDI (OR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.25-0.64), stool output (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.77-0.92), and length of stay (-2.5 days; 95% CrI, -3.4 to -1.5) were also observed in the intervention group. There was no detected difference in vancomycin-resistant Enterococci infection (OR, 0.77; 95% CrI, 0.33-1.75) or mortality (OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.11-1.49). DISCUSSION: The STOP intervention was effective at reducing HO-CDI, length of stay, and symptoms of C difficile in this high-risk cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.