Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40816255›Full record

ArticleThe American naturalist2025

Boom-Bust Cycles Constrain Host-Parasite Dynamics, Suppress Parasite Spread, and Drive Parasites Extinct.

Louis T Bubrig, Amanda K Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American naturalist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Louis T Bubrig
Amanda K Gibson

Funding

A general test of the genetic basis of parasite resistance across genetic and environmental contextsR35GM137975 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GIBSON, AMANDA K · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AbstractHost-parasite theory is rooted in equilibrium dynamics. However, many host species exhibit "boom-bust" life histories or range expansions characterized by population booms and severe bottlenecks. The dynamic host density in boom-bust systems may disrupt the interactions between density-dependent processes such as parasite transmission and birth, resulting in unique dynamics compared with a host population at equilibrium. We subjected a simple compartment model to recurring host bottlenecks to approximate a boom-bust life history. We found that recurring bottlenecks suppressed disease spread by giving the host population an opportunity postbottleneck to expand faster than the disease could spread. As bottlenecks became more frequent and/or severe, disease spread was suppressed to such low levels that parasite extinction was virtually guaranteed. We found that our model was conservative and presented a near-best-case scenario for the parasite. Our results indicate that the dynamic host density of boom-bust systems creates new system behaviors that are not seen in equilibrium models. Additionally, we argue that our results generalize to any horizontally transmitted symbiont, including mutualists and commensals. We conclude that boom-bust dynamics must be explicitly modeled to accurately predict disease spread and the resulting evolutionary dynamics in hosts and their symbionts.

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsModels, BiologicalParasitesPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsSymbiosisboom-bustbottleneckdisturbancehost-parasitesimulation

Identifiers

PMID40816255
PMCPMC12360478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.