Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815831›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2025

"It's Still Exposure Just in a Slightly Different Way"-Understanding the Contribution of Simulation to Developing Physical Therapist Skills in Ireland: An Interpretive Description Study.

Claire M Mulhall, Walter Eppich, Katharine Schulmann, Claire Condron, Suzanne McDonough, Orlagh O'Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire M MulhallRCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6155-0829
Walter EppichSociety for Simulation in Healthcare Fellow, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-2825
Katharine SchulmannCentre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0798-5135
Claire CondronRCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-4263
Suzanne McDonoughSchool of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3758-3302
Orlagh O'SheaSchool of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-6717

Funding

Irish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSimulation-based education (SBE) is increasingly used in physical therapist training to address growing student numbers and clinical placement shortages. However, clinical educators' perspectives on the role of SBE in preparing students for practice remain unexplored.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore physical therapy clinical educators' perspectives on academic-based SBE, particularly how it can equip students for clinical placement and whether it should contribute to practice education hours.

designQualitative interpretive description methodology using semi-structured interviews was used.

settingFive hospital sites across the island of Ireland engaged in physical therapist practice education.

participantsThis study involved 8 physical therapist practice educators and tutors with 6 to 15 years of experience, supervising 2 to 50 students annually. INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPOSURE(S): Individual semistructured interviews were conducted exploring participants' perspectives on SBE's role in clinical education, lasting 40 to 60 minutes each. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Thematic analysis identified patterns in clinical educators' perceptions of SBE's educational value and contribution to practice preparation.

resultsSimulation supported the transition to practice by: (1) priming for clinical environments, (2) enhancing feedback literacy in the workplace, and (3) tackling complexity of clinical practice. Specific clinical skills including documentation, basic safety, manual handling, subjective assessment, and understanding the multidisciplinary team's role were recognized as appropriate for instruction through SBE. Participants reported activities spent in SBE should count toward clinical hours and highlighted that processing feedback during SBE established a foundation for feedback practices in the workplace. Engaging simulated patients in scenarios informed by real patient experiences was proposed as a way of managing complex patient encounters. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SBE provides a means to scaffold the learning of essential clinical skills before practice placement and contributes to clinical education, though more research is needed to determine the proportion. Future research should examine simulated interventions to boost feedback literacy and readiness for clinical settings. Involving patients and the public in the design of SBE curricula is crucial for relevant and beneficial learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy SpecialtySimulation TrainingAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicIrelandMaleQualitative ResearchClinical PlacementCurriculum DesignFeedback LiteracyPhysical TherapistSimulated PatientSimulation-based Education (SBE)

Identifiers

PMID40815831
PMCPMC12463445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.