ArticleUrology practice2025
Adherence and Persistence on Relugolix for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer in the United States Medicare Fee-for-Service Population.
Article in Urology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis real-world study examined persistence and adherence to oral relugolix in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with prostate cancer (PC).
methodsIn Medicare 100% fee-for-service administrative claims data (2019-2023), eligible patients with PC were identified who had ≥ 2 relugolix claims between December 1, 2020, and September 30, 2023, and 12 months of Parts A, B, and D eligibility before and ≥ 90 days after the first relugolix claim (index date). Persistence (time from first relugolix pharmacy claim to the earliest of either a switch to a different androgen deprivation therapy, discontinuation, death, or end of study period) was assessed up to 36 months after index using a 90-day gap in pharmacy claims to define discontinuation. Adherence, defined as the proportion of patients filling prescriptions to relugolix while persistent on therapy, was assessed every 3 months through month 24 after index using a proportion of days covered ≥ 80% method. Analyses were stratified by PC metastatic status.
resultsOf 5274 patients included, 68% had nonmetastatic PC. Mean (SD) persistence was 11.2 (8.1) months in patients with metastatic PC vs 9.4 (6.9) months in patients with nonmetastatic PC (log-rank test
conclusionsPatients who were persistent on relugolix demonstrated high adherence throughout the study, regardless of metastatic status. These results suggest that relugolix has practical utility in real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.