Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2025
Design and initial findings of a natural history study of anal HPV and associated lesions among young adult women in Costa Rica.
Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and initial findings of a natural history study of anal HPV and associated lesions among young adult women in Costa Rica.International journal of cancer · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anal cancer is caused by HPV, and its incidence has increased globally over the last five decades. We conducted an anal HPV natural history study nested in the Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) to quantitatively describe the natural history and clinical outcomes of anal HPV in HIV-negative women. CVT was a randomized clinical trial of the bivalent HPV vaccine, and an anal substudy included women selected based on a priori criteria to enrich for anal disease. For women in the anal substudy, anal samples were collected for cytology and determination of HPV16/18/45 for up to four annual visits. Women were referred for high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) based on abnormal anal cytology or anal HPV16/18/45 positivity. We describe the analytic cohort for this study according to inclusion criteria and factors associated with referral criteria for HRA during study follow-up. 9,416 women, 1,178 were included in the anal substudy (age-range = 23-35-years): 93 had prevalent anal HPV16, 236 had cervical HPV16, 364 had an anal high-risk HPV infection other than 16, 295 had anal low-risk HPV, and 227 were included as anal HPV-negative controls; 352 women were included because of a CIN3+ in study follow-up. From 3,033 study visits over a median of 70 months follow-up, 71 (6%) women were referred to HRA. This anal study nested within the CVT infrastructure and enriched for anal disease provides a unique setting to address research questions related to the natural history of anal HPV infections and associated lesions in women without HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.