Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815520›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Performance Drift in a Nationally Deployed Population Health Risk Algorithm in the US Veterans Health Administration.

Likhitha Kolla, Kristin Linn, Amol S Navathe, Craig Kreisler, Christopher B Roberts, Sae-Hwan Park, Harvineet Singh, Jean Feng, Jinbo Chen, Ravi B Parikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Likhitha KollaPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kristin LinnPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Amol S NavathePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Craig KreislerThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Christopher B RobertsUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sae-Hwan ParkPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Harvineet SinghDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Jean FengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Jinbo ChenPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ravi B ParikhThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinical risk algorithms inform clinical decision support and system-level quality metrics. However, algorithm performance can drift over time and possibly promote misinformed decision-making and resource allocation. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Care Assessment Needs (CAN) algorithm is a nationally deployed population risk algorithm used to predict risk of 90-day hospitalization and/or mortality and to allocate resources for more than 5 million veterans annually. However, drift affecting the VA CAN has not been assessed. Objective: To evaluate the impact of drift in the VA CAN algorithm and the extent, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of performance changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, which contains observations from more than 5 million veterans per study year. The data comprised 27 787 152 observations among 7 215 711 unique veterans receiving VA primary care from 2016 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from January 2023 and December 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary outcomes were change in model performance (true positive rate [TPR], false positive rate [FPR], positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV], F1 score, and accuracy); and a national quality metric (% of veterans with CAN ≥90th percentile with a palliative care visit). Results: The study population included 7 215 711 eligible veterans, with a mean (SD) age of 62.1 (16.5); 91.2% were male and 18.2% were Black, 6.6% Hispanic, and 76.2% White individuals. From 2016 to 2021, PPV decreased by 4.0% (95% CI, -2.8% to -5.1%); F1 score decreased by 4.6% (95% CI, -6.1% to 3.0%); NPV increased by 0.43% (95% CI, 0.30% to 0.57%); and FPR increased by 0.34% (95% CI, 0.10% to 0.58%), which corresponds with 18 288 increased false positive results. TPR and accuracy remained stable. The 90-day hospitalization and/or death rates decreased from 3.8% in 2017 to 3.0% in 2021. Covariate shifts were observed in 19 covariates, with demographic characteristics, health care utilization, and laboratory covariates exhibiting the largest shifts. The palliative care quality metric was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.8% to 2.9%) in 2018, 2.6% (95% CI, 2.6% to 2.7%) in 2019, and 2.8% (95% CI, 2.7% to 2.8%) in 2020, with FPRs among metric-eligible veterans increasing from 81.6% (95% CI, 81.5% to 81.7%) in 2018 to 85.7% (95% CI, 85.6% to 85.8%) in 2020. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that CAN algorithm performance declined from 2016 to 2021 due to shifts in outcome prevalence and distributions of health care utilization and demographic covariates. Close surveillance of clinical risk algorithms and quality metrics derived from algorithm-generated risk scores could mitigate suboptimal resource allocation or decision-making.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPopulation HealthUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesVeterans Health

Identifiers

PMID40815520
PMCPMC12357188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.