Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes With Vital Sign Monitoring During Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Therapy: The PRO-DUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Application of Digital Technology in Palliative Care in Japan.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2026Review
- Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Time Toxicity in Advanced Breast Cancer: Psychological Burden, Psychiatric Vulnerability, and Implications for Patient-Centered Decision-Making.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Web questionnaire survey of physicians and patients on the side effects of trifluridine/tipiracil.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Feasibility of weekly patient-reported symptom monitoring using patients' own smartphones in outpatient cancer chemotherapy: the SMART-PRO study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- From toxicity to signal: positioning symptom clusters as pharmacodynamic indicators in ICI therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a new standard of care, may experience specific adverse events affecting their quality of life (QOL). Monitoring electronic patient-reported outcomes alongside vital signs may help improve their QOL through early detection and management of these symptoms. Objective: To assess whether symptom tracking and vital sign monitoring improve QOL compared with usual care in patients receiving T-DXd. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted at 38 Japanese hospitals from March 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024, assigned patients with ERBB2-positive MBC eligible for T-DXd to either a monitoring or usual care group. Intervention: Randomization was 1:1 for the monitoring and usual care groups. Patients in the monitoring group recorded weekly symptom reports and daily body temperature and percutaneous oxygen saturation data using a smartphone or tablet. Alerts were sent to medical staff when symptom or vital sign thresholds were exceeded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change from baseline in global health status scores at week 24, assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (scores range from 0 to 100, in which higher scores indicate a better quality of life and level of functioning). For symptom scales, however, higher scores indicate a worse symptom burden. Secondary outcomes included changes in functional and symptom scales, as well as survival outcomes. Results: Of 111 female patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [11.0] years), 56 (50.5%) were randomized to the monitoring group and 55 (49.5%) to the usual care group. Baseline patient characteristics and QOL scores were comparable between the 2 groups. At week 24, the mean change in the global health status score from baseline was higher in the monitoring group compared with the usual care group (mean difference, 8.0 [90% CI, 0.2-15.8]; P = .09). Improvements in functional scales were noted in the monitoring group for role (mean difference, 10.0 [95% CI, 1.1-18.9]), cognitive (6.3 [95% CI, 1.1-11.5]), and social (10.9 [95% CI, 3.9-18.0]) functioning. Fatigue scores were lower in the monitoring group (mean difference, -8.4 [95% CI, -16.1 to -0.6]), although nausea or vomiting scores were similar between the groups (mean difference, 0.5 [95% CI, -6.2 to 7.1]). No significant differences were observed in survival outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients with ERBB2-positive MBC receiving T-DXd, the findings suggest that electronic symptom and vital sign tracking may help maintain QOL or prevented its deterioration. While survival outcomes were unaffected, this monitoring strategy has potential to enhance patient-centered care. Trial Registration: jRCT identifier: jRCTs031200387.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.