ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
DR and SPIT: Statistical approaches for identifying transient structure in intrinsically disordered proteins via NMR chemical shifts.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DR and SPIT: Statistical approaches for identifying transient structure in intrinsically disordered proteins via NMR chemical shifts.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) play key roles in various biological processes; they are associated with liquid-liquid phase separation and are targets in disorder-based drug design. Efforts to identify their structural propensities-that can be linked to molecular recognition, malfunction, targeting-still lead to ambiguous results. Secondary structure is routinely assessed by NMR spectroscopy by calculating the secondary chemical shifts (SCSs). Focusing on a given environment in the polypeptide backbone, SCSs highlight the deviation from the "random coil" state. However, the analysis is dependent on which of the numerous random coil chemical shift (RCCS) predictors is applied in the calculations, resulting in an especially pronounced ambiguity for IDPs. To overcome this, we introduce two novel statistical tools that enable the sound identification of structural propensities. We propose the chemical shift discordance ratio (DR) for prefiltering RCCS predictors based on self-consistency. Further on, we introduce the Structural Propensity Identification by t-statistics (SPIT) approach for extracting maximum information from SCS data by using multiple RCCS predictors simultaneously. This way SCS patterns indicating structural propensities can be clearly distinguished from the "noise". The applicability of these methods is demonstrated for four proteins of varying degrees of disorder. Ubiquitin and α-synuclein are used as respective benchmarks for a globular and a disordered protein, while two proline-rich IDPs are included as especially challenging molecules in secondary structure analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.