Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815458›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2025

Institutional Responses to Voluntary Assisted Dying: An Empirical Study in Victoria and Western Australia.

C M Haining, L Willmott, B P White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C M HainingAustralian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia. casey.haining@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-6654
L WillmottAustralian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.
B P WhiteAustralian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT190100410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients seeking to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) are necessarily at the end of their lives. Hence, they are likely to be concurrently receiving care from institutions (community nursing services, health services, palliative care services, and aged care facilities) with different levels of participation in VAD. This article reports on the various institutional approaches to VAD based on eighteen semi-structured interviews with regulators from Victoria and Western Australia, representing fifteen institutions with varying levels of support for VAD. We generated five main themes from reflexive thematic analysis of the interview data: settling on a position; operationalizing a position and determining level of involvement; local policy decisions on specific VAD activities; transparency; and navigating pluralism and accommodating diverse views. Overall, our findings revealed significant diversity in how institutions approached various VAD activities and that an institution's position on VAD (whether it supports it or not) does not necessarily indicate the extent to which it will facilitate access to VAD. These findings may have relevance for institutions seeking to implement (or revise) their approach to VAD and suggest that greater transparency about institutional approaches to VAD is needed to enable people to make informed decisions about where to seek care.

Indexed as

Euthanasia, Active, VoluntarySuicide, AssistedEmpirical ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicPalliative CareVictoriaWestern AustraliaEnd-of-lifeInstitutionsLocalQualitativeRegulationVoluntary assisted dying

Identifiers

PMID40815458
PMCPMC12783208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.