Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815452›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Automatic activation of the shared-digit network in the solution of complex multiplication problems.

Smadar Sapir-Yogev, Sarit Ashkenazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Smadar Sapir-YogevThe Seymour Fox School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91905, Jerusalem, Israel. yogev976@bezeqint.net.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-0087
Sarit AshkenaziThe Seymour Fox School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91905, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the associative network of single-digit multiplication problems is automatically activated, even when participants perform irrelevant tasks, and that single-digit multiplication problems automatically activate all single-digit problems sharing at least one digit with them (the shared-digit network; SDN). We examined whether the SDN would also be automatically activated when participants perform an irrelevant task. Specifically, we asked whether complex multiplication problems (e.g., 2 × 12 = ) automatically activate all single-digit problems that share digits with them. In Experiment 1, participants solved all complex problems whose solutions were less than 100. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants solved sets of complex problems that differed in SDN size and in carryover status and were matched in problem size. Participants reported the strategies they used to solve the problems. Results showed that SDN size, which reflected the number of single-digit problems sharing digits with the complex problem, predicted speed and accuracy in the solution of complex problems. Regardless of carryover status and strategy, participants solved complex problems with small SDNs more quickly than complex problems with large SDNs. Regardless of carryover status, participants used retrieval more often when solving problems with a small SDN than with a large SDN. Thus, we have demonstrated that SDN size determines speed and accuracy in the solution of complex multiplication problems, and that the SDN is automatically activated even during performance of an irrelevant task.

Indexed as

Mathematical ConceptsProblem SolvingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultArithmeticAssociative networkComplex multiplicationMathematical knowledgeMultiplication tableNumerical cognition

Identifiers

PMID40815452
PMCPMC12957635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.