Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815437›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Controversies in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): pregnancy, paediatric, abdominal trauma, complex renal cysts, and endovascular aortic repair follow-up.

Paul S Sidhu, Dirk Andre Clevert, Annamaria Deganello, Maciej Piskunowicz, Vito Cantisani, Thomas Fischer, European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul S SidhuDepartment of Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Dirk Andre ClevertInterdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany.
Annamaria DeganelloDepartment of Imaging Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Maciej PiskunowiczRadiology Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Vito CantisaniDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Thomas FischerDepartment of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in clinical practice is theoretically limited to the licensed indications: focal liver lesions, breast, peripheral arterial system, and the heart. In reality, there has been a continuous expansion of the deployment of CEUS examinations to many other organs and body parts over the last 20 years. Many of these applications are a natural extension of the diagnostic capabilities of the CEUS examination, used to achieve a better imaging outcome. These applications have been supported by guidelines issued by scientific societies, detailing the application, accuracy, and safety of the clinical performance. Nevertheless, there are some areas in which it remains more difficult to establish the use of CEUS in the diagnostic pathway. In the pregnant patient, CEUS is an ideal examination-a natural extension of B-mode ultrasound, avoiding ionising radiation and iodinated contrast. The contrast agents used in ultrasound do not cross the placental barrier. Ultrasound in the paediatric patient is used widely, and extending this to a CEUS examination improves diagnostic capabilities, avoiding less child-friendly imaging techniques. The parent can be in the room at the time of the ultrasound examination. Other aspects of CEUS usage are hampered by the lack of physician engagement despite the proven advantages of the technique, the reduction in the morbidity associated with CT and MR imaging, particularly the contrast agents used in these modalities. Complex renal cyst classification, follow-up of blunt abdominal trauma and the surveillance following placement of an aortic stent graft are all areas of potential benefit to the diagnosis. All these are better imaged on a CEUS examination. Furthermore, cost savings can be achieved using CEUS, mostly by alleviating downstream costs of CT and MR imaging. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CEUS use outside licensed uses is becoming established, driven by the unique ability to achieve diagnostic standards safely and with patient acceptability, pushing the boundaries in areas of abdominal trauma, pregnancy, paediatrics, aortic implants, and complex renal cysts. KEY POINTS: CEUS has a narrow range of licensed applications in medical imaging, but is used widely. An exclusively intravascular agent allows assessment of vascular flow at the capillary level. CEUS is extremely safe and can be used in many areas that require repeated high-resolution imaging.

Indexed as

Contrast-enhancedPaediatricPregnancyTraumaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID40815437
PMCPMC12356814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.