ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Creation and Effectiveness of a HeadSmart-Based Primary Provider Education Tool for Timely Pediatric CNS Tumor Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients of minority race, ethnicity, and lower socioeconomic status experience poorer survival of pediatric CNS tumors in the US. These disparities arise in part from differences in stage of disease at diagnosis, suggesting potential for mitigation via earlier diagnosis. The UK HeadSmart campaign, designed to increase awareness of pediatric CNS tumor symptoms among primary care practitioners (PCPs) and the public, has led to a significant decrease in time to diagnosis. We adapted HeadSmart into a 30-min workshop on presentation, common symptoms, work-up, and diagnosis to investigate the intervention's value in the US. We collected demographic data on the participants, paired with a pre/post, multiple-choice assessment of their knowledge of pediatric CNS tumor diagnosis. A total of 57 providers participated in the survey; 28 completed both the pre- and post-assessments. The mean pre-workshop score was 4.12; the mean post-workshop score was 5.64 (unpaired t-test p = 0.0002). The mean improvement was 1.1 (paired t-test p = 0.0002). In summary, an educational tool based on HeadSmart is effective at increasing understanding of timely diagnosis of pediatric CNS tumors among US PCPs. Further study, refinement, and dissemination have the potential to help mitigate disparities in pediatric CNS tumor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40815425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.