SynthesisPediatric radiology2025
A systematic review of radiation dose to the eye lens from pediatric brain computed tomography scans.
Synthesis in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing use of pediatric brain computed tomography (CT) and the International Commission on Radiological Protection's revised threshold for radiation-induced lens opacities, concerns have grown regarding cumulative radiation exposure to the eye lens.
objectiveThis review examines the magnitude of lens doses reported in pediatric brain CT and the methodologies used to estimate these doses.
methodsA systematic literature search of MedLine, Embase, and PubMed (2012-2024) identified 18 eligible studies, including direct patient measurements, phantom-based experiments, and computational modeling.
resultsReported lens doses varied widely across studies. Software-based tools generally estimate higher doses than those measured directly on patients or phantoms. Multiple dose-reduction strategies such as gantry tilting, organ-based tube current modulation, and protocol optimization were effective in significantly lowering lens exposure without compromising diagnostic quality.
conclusionIn all cases, individual scan doses remain below the cataractogenic threshold. However, children undergoing repeated imaging may exceed this limit over time. Cumulative lens dose tracking and routine implementation of orbit-sparing techniques are recommended to reduce long-term radiation risk in vulnerable pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.