Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815372›Full record

ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2025

[Airway management in children : What should be known in pediatric anesthesia].

J Henkel, T Ninke

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J HenkelKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU-Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
T NinkeKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU-Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. tobias.ninke@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric airway management can be much more difficult due to physiological and anatomical characteristics. Special attention should be paid to signs for a difficult airway when taking an anesthesiological anamnesis. This applies especially to children with syndromale diseases. During the induction of a general anesthesia, special attention should be paid to an optimal positioning of the child`s head (avoidance of a steep reclination or flexion of the head) and a correct "utilization" of the ventilation facemask. Securing the pediatric airway with a laryngeal mask can provide decisive advantages, especially for the less experienced as it is much simpler to manage. For endotracheal intubation apneic oxygenation should be used in every case, in order to prolong the apneic tolerance and to prevent oxygen desaturation. Video laryngoscopy should now preferentially be used in pediatric anesthesia, whereby both direct and indirect laryngoscopy-techniques can be performed. A change of the laryngoscope is no longer necessary and the first-pass success of the endotracheal tube is increased. The extubation can be performed with the child in both the supine or lateral position and also awake or asleep. The various possibilities have different advantages and disadvantages and should be used according to the preference of the anesthetist caring for the individual child.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthesiaPediatricsAnesthesia, GeneralChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngeal MasksLaryngoscopyPediatric AnesthesiaApneic oxygenationExtubationLaryngeal masksPediatric anesthesiaVideo laryngoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.