SynthesisEuropean radiology2026
Diagnostic yield of MRI in adult patients with dizziness or vertigo at the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDizziness and vertigo are common in the emergency department, often requiring an MRI to detect central causes. However, utilization varies widely. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantify the diagnostic yield and utilization rate of MRI in adult emergency department patients and assess the impact of clinical setting, patient selection, and imaging protocols. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (until June 9, 2025) identified studies evaluating MRI in adult emergency department patients with dizziness or vertigo. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Pooled proportions were calculated via random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses for patient selection, exclusion of peripheral vertigo, and MRI protocols.
resultsSeventeen studies, including 42,994 patients, were analyzed. The mean age across studies ranged from 47.3 to 65.1 years, with an overall male proportion of 39.8% (17,121 men). The pooled MRI diagnostic yield was 13.1% (95% CI: 8.3-20.2), and MRI utilization was 23.2% (95% CI: 14.0-33.9). Isolated dizziness had a lower yield (5.7% vs 17.8%; p < 0.01). Excluding peripheral vertigo increased MRI use (30.1% vs 21.0%; p = 0.043) but did not improve yield (14.4% vs 11.4%; p = 0.32). DWI-only protocols had lower yield (4.3% vs 13.6%; p = 0.03) but higher utilization (71.5% vs 23.2%; p < 0.01).
conclusionMRI was used in 23.2% of emergency department patients, with a 13.1% diagnostic yield. DWI-only protocols improve access but miss key findings. Optimizing imaging strategies can enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. KEY POINTS: Question What is the diagnostic yield of MRI in adult emergency patients with dizziness or vertigo, and how do selection criteria and imaging protocols affect outcomes? Findings MRI diagnostic yield was 13.1% (utilization: 23.2%). DWI-only protocols were used more often (71.5%) but showed lower yield (4.3%). Yield for isolated dizziness was 5.7%. Clinical relevance While MRI is efficient for detecting central causes of dizziness, its yield is low in cases of isolated dizziness without neurological signs. Comprehensive clinical judgment and optimized protocols are essential to prevent unnecessary imaging in the emergency setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40815308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.