ArticleThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons2026
Impact of Weight-Bearing Status on Patient Gait During Fracture Recovery.
Article in The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOptimizing weight-bearing can enhance fracture recovery, but measuring the response to weight-bearing protocols has been challenging to continuously and reliably study. We investigated whether smartphone-captured mobility metrics could detect functional differences in patients prescribed either early weight-bearing or delayed weight-bearing after lower extremity fractures.
methodsWe conducted a cohort study, including adult patients with lower extremity fractures treated surgically, ≥6 months of follow-up, and an Apple iPhone for ≥1 year before injury. Patients with bilateral lower extremity fractures were excluded. Patients were classified as early weight-bearing or delayed weight-bearing. The primary outcome was step count, measured by the Apple iPhone Health application, within 12 weeks of injury. Secondary outcomes included walking speed and asymmetry, and an extended observation to 26 weeks postinjury. Between-group differences were estimated using linear mixed-effects models, controlling for preinjury mobility, age, sex, open fracture, and fracture location.
resultsWe enrolled 74 patients (mean age, 46 [SD, 19] years; 43% female), with 27 patients in the early weight-bearing group and 47 patients in the delayed weight-bearing group. Within 12 weeks of injury, early weight-bearing patients had markedly more daily steps than delayed weight-bearing patients (mean difference, 1,050 steps per day; 95% confidence interval [CI], 373 to 1,727; P = 0.002). Secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups within 12 weeks of injury. However, by 26 weeks after injury, early weight-bearing patients had faster walking speeds (mean difference, 0.13 m/s; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.22; P = 0.004) and less walking asymmetry (mean difference, -12.2%; 95% CI, -21.3% to -3.1%; P = 0.008) than delayed weight-bearing patients. DISCUSSION: Among patients with surgically treated lower extremity fractures, smartphone-collected step counts were higher in early versus delayed weight-bearing patients within 12 weeks of injury. These findings suggest that postoperative weight-bearing protocols affect patient mobility and can be measured continuously and remotely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.