Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40815117›Full record

SynthesisPharmacology2025

Safety and Efficacy of Givinostat for Patients with Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review.

Prasanjit Das, Bisweswar Ojha, Alapan Das, Bhairav Kumar Pathak, Kaushik Mukhopadhyay

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prasanjit DasDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani, Kalyani, India.
Bisweswar OjhaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani, Kalyani, India.
Alapan DasDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani, Kalyani, India, newborn91@gmail.com.
Bhairav Kumar PathakDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, India.
Kaushik MukhopadhyayDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani, Kalyani, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMuscular dystrophy (MD) refers to a group of genetic disorders leading to progressive weakness and degeneration of skeletal muscle. Among them, Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are the most common types. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (i.e., givinostat) is a recently approved therapy for DMD. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate givinostat in MD patients regarding safety and efficacy.

methodsA systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines by searching through Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Only randomized control trials comparing givinostat vs. placebo or other therapies are included. The primary outcomes were motor function alteration and histopathologic muscle changes and the secondary outcomes were the adverse reactions.

resultsA total of 188 records were identified, and after screening, two clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. In DMD patients, givinostat significantly slowed disease progression, improving four-stair climb times (p = 0.037) and reducing muscle fat infiltration. In BMD patients, fibrosis progression was not significantly different (p = 0.8282), but MRI showed reduced muscle fat replacement. Common adverse events included diarrhoea, thrombocytopenia, and hypertriglyceridemia, leading to dose reductions, though no new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were observed.

conclusionGivinostat seems to be effective in slowing disease progression in DMD but has little benefit in BMD. Its safety profile requires rigorous monitoring. Efficacy difference might be explained by the pathophysiology of the disease and the progression rate. Larger and longer follow-up trials are warranted to confirm longer term benefits and to optimize dosing strategies. Givinostat offers potential as a disease-modifying therapy for DMD but requires further investigation to establish its role in BMD.

Indexed as

Genetic therapyGivinostatMusculoskeletal diseasesPaediatricsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40815117
PMCPMC12503821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.