ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
Aperiodic activity masks sensorimotor mu suppression during human action observation.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In electroencephalography (EEG), action execution (AE) is reliably associated with reductions in the mu rhythm, a periodic oscillation (8-14 Hz) over sensorimotor cortex. Similar patterns of "mu suppression" have been reported during observations of others' actions, leading to claims that the mu rhythm indexes motor contributions to social perception. However, evidence for mu suppression during action observation (AO) is mixed, possibly due to methodological considerations (e.g. sample size, recording sites) and perceptual and attentional confounds. Moreover, measurements of periodic oscillations may be conflated with underlying aperiodic ("1/f-like") neural activity, potentially influencing estimation of the EEG power spectrum. Here we examined the influence of aperiodic factors on mu suppression using 128-channel EEG in a large sample (N = 109), both during AE and in an AO task with appropriate visual and attentional controls. Whereas AE was consistently associated with significant mu suppression, we initially failed to find significant mu suppression for AO, suggesting that attentional and perceptual confounds may bias mu estimation during AO. However, removing the aperiodic component restored mu suppression over central electrodes. Although significant, mu suppression for AO appears less robust than originally reported, with aperiodic activity contributing to variability in the estimation of mu suppression during AO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.