ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2026
Exploring the Neurobiological Mechanisms of Cancer Growth.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuron-tumor interplay in colorectal cancer: from mechanisms of onset and progression to targeted therapies.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Biomarkers and Breakdowns: Neuroinflammatory Drivers Linking Sleep Disorders and Chronic Pain.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Neural-immune-cancer crosstalk in pancreatic cancer: mechanisms and clinical translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging evidence reveals that interactions between the nervous system and tumor biology significantly influence cancer progression, metastasis, and therapeutic outcomes. Here, we elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms that underpin tumor development, highlighting the dynamic role of neural components within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Neural signals and structural adaptations in the TME stimulate tumorigenesis and enable cancer cell plasticity, mimicking neurodevelopmental processes. Astrocytic glial cells release neurotrophic factors that support metastatic colonization and enhance tumor cell survival. Notably, cancer cells can establish pseudo-tripartite synapses with neurons, promoting both proliferation and invasion. We explore the cancer-neural network interplay, emphasizing how axonal remodeling, circuit reorganization, and synaptic dysfunction not only drive tumor growth but also contribute to associated symptoms like seizures and chronic pain. Molecularly, mutations such as in PIK3CA and abnormalities in neurotransmitter signaling reveal how neurotumors communicate and adapt. Furthermore, metabolic stress responses from tumor cells can activate nociceptive neurons, sustaining malignant progression. Understanding these neurobiological interactions opens avenues for novel therapeutic strategies. Precision neuro-oncology may benefit from targeting neurotrophic signaling, synaptic pathways, and neuronal differentiation programs. Advances in biomarker research from neurotumors also contribute to improved diagnostic and prognostic tools. By integrating neuroscience insights into oncological frameworks, we propose a paradigm shift toward therapies that intercept the neural circuitry sustaining malignancies. This neuro-oncological approach holds promise in addressing aggressive cancer phenotypes and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40814874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.