Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814817›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Exploring potential barriers and facilitators to integrate tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco control programmes in India.

Nisha Mutalikdesai, Kajal Tonde, Kanchan Shinde, Rakesh Kumar, Surbhi Gupta, Girish Dayma, Anand Krishnan, Sanjay Juvekar, Ailana Santosa, Nawi Ng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nisha MutalikdesaiCommunity Health Research Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Kajal TondeVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Kanchan ShindeCommunity Health Research Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Rakesh KumarCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Surbhi GuptaCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Girish DaymaCommunity Health Research Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Anand KrishnanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay JuvekarCommunity Health Research Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Ailana SantosaInstitution of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nawi NgInstitution of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Rutuja PatilCommunity Health Research Unit, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Co-integrating tuberculosis (TB), diabetes mellitus (DM), and tobacco control (TC) programmes in India could help address the triple burden of these diseases. However, limited information exists regarding the feasibility and determining factors of such integration. We explored potential barriers and facilitators to integrating TB, DM, and TC programmes in Ambegaon Block of Pune District, Maharashtra, and Ballabgarh Block of Faridabad District, Haryana, in India. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with health workers, programme managers, and stakeholders involved in TB, DM, and TC programme implementation whom we enrolled using purposive and snowball sampling. The interview guide was based on World Health Organization's Health System Strengthening framework. We collected the data between November 2022 and March 2023 and analysed it through the rapid analysis method. Results: We interviewed 32 participants. The major challenge for integration, according to the participants' perspectives, relates to the level of service delivery, which is primarily attributed to inadequate implementation of all the programmes. Themes that emerged as facilitators were well-designed programmes with robust guidelines and ample space for infrastructure, while those seen as barriers included inadequate referral systems, insufficient infrastructure, limited resources, a shortage of trained staff, and a lack of essential drugs and equipment, all of which impeded the uptake and coverage of services. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the critical importance of addressing barriers and facilitators to implementing programmes in India for tackling the triple burden of TB, DM, and TC. A multidimensional approach and targeted strategies are needed for overcoming these challenges. Sensitising the health system staff, implementing feedback and referral systems, and developing cross-programme digital platforms will offer a roadmap for policymakers and healthcare system managers.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes MellitusTuberculosisFemaleHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchTobacco Control

Identifiers

PMID40814817
PMCPMC12355441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.