Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814806›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Outcomes of medical management of miscarriage in an early pregnancy setting.

S Elsayed, J Gowran, N Mention, N Farah, M Anglim, A C O'Higgins

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes of medical management of miscarriage in an early pregnancy setting.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S ElsayedThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0467-9009
J GowranThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
N MentionThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
N FarahThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M AnglimThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
A C O'HigginsThe early pregnancy unit, The Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMiscarriage is the most common complication of pregnancy. Medical management with misoprostol offers an alternative to surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of medical management of first-trimester miscarriage in the setting of an early pregnancy unit at a tertiary maternity hospital.

methodsThis observational cohort study prospectively investigated the outcomes of medical management for first-trimester miscarriage in 186 women recruited over 18 months. The treatment protocol consisted of two doses of 600 mcg of oral misoprostol, with follow-up ultrasound 10-14 days later.

resultsAn overall efficacy rate of 68.8% (128/186), with a complete miscarriage rate of 47.5% (87/193) at the first follow-up scan (10-14 days) was achieved. Incomplete miscarriages and missed miscarriages had similar outcomes: 47.1% (8/17) and 46.7% (79/169) respectively. Expectant management following failed medical management showed higher complete miscarriage rate (81.5%, 22/27) in comparison with repeat medical management (47.6%, 20/42) (P = 0.005). The complication rate was low, with 4.8% (9/186) requiring unplanned surgical intervention.

conclusionWe report a low complication rate following medical management of first trimester miscarriage in a study where care is led by patient choice. This study highlights the need for standardized criteria for diagnosing complete miscarriage and the potential benefits of expectant management following failed medical treatment. Future studies with standardized definitions and core outcome sets would facilitate better comparison across trials and inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

Abortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalAbortion, SpontaneousMisoprostolAbortion, IncompleteAbortion, MissedAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAbortifacient Agents, NonsteroidalMisoprostolfirst trimestermedical managementmiscarriagemisoprostolpregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID40814806
PMCPMC12790662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.