ArticleJTCVS techniques2025
Outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with heritable thoracic aortic diseases.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02089607 (Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Measures in Patients Treated for Complex Abdominal, Thoracoabdominal and Aortic Arch Aneurysms or Dissections With Fenestrated and Branched Stent Grafts), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Measures in Patients Treated for Complex Abdominal, Thoracoabdominal and Aortic Arch Aneurysms or Dissections With Fenestrated and Branched Stent Grafts
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched stent grafts in patients ≤65 years: A bicenter retrospective study.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Open Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Endovascular Era: When and for Whom.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Open surgical repair is the first-line treatment for patients with complex aortic aneurysms and heritable thoracic aortic diseases (HTADs). Fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) has been used selectively in higher-risk patients. This study assessed early- and midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms in patients with HTADs. Methods: We reviewed clinical data, imaging, and outcomes of consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms from April 2007 to June 2024. Patients with confirmed Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or Results: Among 850 patients (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 49-70 years; 8 [53%] men) treated by FB-EVAR for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 15 (1.8%) had confirmed HTADs. Technical success was achieved with no early mortality in all patients. Early outcomes showed no cerebrovascular or major cardiac events. One patient developed delayed paraparesis with complete recovery. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range, 13-34 months) with no aortic-related mortality and aortic aneurysm rupture. One patient developed a late retrograde dissection treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patient survival and cumulative incidence of secondary interventions at 1 year were 93% ± 16% and 10.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-26.8%), respectively. Conclusions: FB-EVAR in select patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HTADs was associated with high technical success and no early mortality. Midterm outcomes revealed no aortic-related mortality or aortic aneurysm rupture, but 1 in 3 patients required secondary interventions, highlighting the importance of continuous surveillance in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.