Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40814637›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

CARI Guideline: Evidence-Based Recommendations for Balanced Electrolyte Solutions to Improve Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Colm O'Reilly, David Tunnicliffe, Allan Blackley, Michael Collins, Emmy O'Neill, Siah Kim, Karthik Venkataraman, Emily See, Ross Francis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Colm O'ReillySydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David TunnicliffeSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Allan BlackleyConsumer Partner, Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael CollinsAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Emmy O'NeillTransplant Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Siah KimSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karthik VenkataramanAdelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Emily SeeDepartments of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ross FrancisFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is an optimal treatment for kidney failure; however, delayed graft function is a common complication with a prevalence of up to 40% in deceased donor transplantation. The use of i.v. fluids during kidney transplantation is required for hemodynamic stability; however, there are concerns that normal saline may contribute to increased delayed graft function and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Balanced electrolyte solutions have been suggested as an alternative i.v. fluid that may decrease delayed graft function. However, there have been concerns that this may increase hyperkalemia in transplant recipients. This guideline seeks to synthesize the available evidence and make recommendations for the Australian and New Zealand care by a multidisciplinary working group, including consumers with lived experience of kidney transplantation. A recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including data from the BEST Fluids trial, evaluating balanced electrolyte solutions versus normal saline in kidney transplants was identified and absolute effects were determined using baseline risks of SONG Transplant Core outcomes from either national registries or event rates in the control arms of the included trials. All outcomes were assessed using the GRADE certainty of evidence. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework was used to develop recommendations for care and clinical practice points. Balanced electrolyte solution compared with normal saline resulted in an 18% reduction in delayed graft function (7 studies, 1306 participants, risk ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.94) and no differences across living and deceased donation were evident. In deceased donation, balanced electrolyte solution compared with normal saline has a clinically important decrease in delayed graft function (69 fewer per 1000 patients; 95% CI: 111 to 23 fewer]). The use of balanced electrolyte solution compared with normal saline has an unclear effect on hyperkalemia but it may be no different (66 fewer per 1000 patients; 95% CI: 207 fewer to 136 more). In living donation, the use of balanced electrolyte solutions had very small benefits on the risk of delayed graft function (7 few per 1000 patients; 95% CI: 12 fewer to 2 fewer). In those receiving a living donor kidney transplant, the effects of balanced electrolyte solutions compared with normal saline on hyperkalemia were unclear but are likely to be no different (25 fewer per 1000 patients; 95% CI: 79 fewer to 52 more). Balanced electrolyte solutions are recommended for deceased donor transplants, with a moderate certainty of evidence. However, in living donation transplants balanced electrolyte solutions are only suggested with a low degree of certainty of evidence. Further research is needed on patient-centered outcomes and the use of balanced solutions in pediatric populations to optimize kidney transplant care.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinesintravenous fluidskidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40814637
PMCPMC12347848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.