ArticleKidney international reports2025
Japanese Patients' Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in Renal Replacement Therapy.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications Related to Urgent Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis in a Mexican Hospital with Limited Resources: A Prospective Cohort.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Clinical epidemiology for comprehensive kidney care: a framework for developing clinical research questions, from biomarkers to patient-reported outcomes.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- Shared Decision Making and Advance Care Planning in the Context of Promoting Home Medical Care in Japan: A Narrative Review.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Review
- Conservative Kidney Management as an Integral Part of Shared Decision-Making in Advanced CKD.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor Entitled: Conservative Kidney Management as an Integral Part of Shared Decision-Making in Advanced CKD.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Exploring barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making for older adults in East Asian health systems: a scoping review.Innovation in aging · 2026Review
- Shared decision-making for kidney replacement therapy: a comprehensive review and a proposed model.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a key process in selecting renal replacement therapy (RRT). This study analyzed SDM perceptions, preferences, as well as patient- and facility-level factors influencing SDM perception among Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who selected RRT. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 475 adult patients with CKD from 49 medical facilities. SDM awareness and recognition, preferences for SDM timing and frequency, discussion content, and desired professional involvement were assessed. Patient- and facility-level factors associated with SDM perceptions were evaluated using multivariable analysis. Results: The mean participant age was 67.4 years. Hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation were chosen by 71%, 24.4%, and 4.4% of patients, respectively. Although 81.2% recalled SDM occurring during RRT selection, only 4.7% were well aware of SDM before the survey. Patients prioritized discussions about daily life impact, financial burden, and family-related concerns. Most patients preferred SDM initiation when RRT was imminent, and to be conducted over multiple sessions. Many patients valued the involvement of medical social workers and their usual nonnephrologist physicians in addition to nephrologists. Multiple outpatient visits for RRT selection, involving nurse participation and extended consultation times, were significantly associated with SDM perceptions (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-2.42). Conclusion: Many Japanese patients with CKD retrospectively evaluated RRT selection as involving SDM; however, a few were familiar with the concept beforehand. This underscores the importance of establishing systems that facilitate repeated SDM discussions at critical moments for patients. These discussions should emphasize the impact of RRT on patients' lives and involve a multidisciplinary team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.